What is needed for national implementation?
Engaging in Article 6 requires the establishment of robust frameworks and processes, including procedures for authorisation, activity registration, accounting of mitigation outcomes, and reporting. Countries can leverage existing structures, refining them to better align with national priorities and circumstances, while ensuring full adherence to the Article 6 requirements.
Download this Excel-based checklist to guide you through Article 6 implementation, supported by evaluation questions for each step: Article 6 implementation checklist
What are mandates and legal foundations for Article 6?
The international rules on Article 6.2 and Article 6.4 require the governments of participating Parties to make crucial decisions. For Article 6.2, decisions involve approving activities and granting authorisations, among others. Under the PACM, countries also need to decide certain aspects, such as defining eligible activities. The national procedures and rules to operationalise Article 6 need to be anchored in legal foundations and mandates.
Download Information Note on Mandate and Legal FoundationThese case studies delineate diverse strategies to enhance Article 6 readiness by specifying participation prerequisites through legal mandates. They showcase a range of approaches influenced by the existing legal structures in each nation.
Download Case Studies[Forthcoming: Establishing a national governance structure and providing legal legitimacy to institutions operating to implement Article 6 in the country]
[Forthcoming: Cooperation Agreements]
Tracker: Carbon Market Regulations Tracker (Gold Standard 2025)
Blueprint: legal blueprint for developing and regulating carbon markets: guidance for law and policymakers (ADB 2025)
Repository: Scaling Cooperation: Bilateral Agreements and Article 6.4 Mechanism (A6IP 2026)
Report: Developing an Article 6 host party strategy (GGGI 2023)
How to determine national governance structures and institutional arrangements?
For a government to effectively implement Article 6, it remains essential to establish the appropriate governance structures and institutional arrangements. This involves defining roles and responsibilities for key actors, such as national focal points, to carry out their tasks and obligations under Article 6.
The designation of a Designated National Authority (DNA) is a mandatory requirement for Article 6.4, emphasising the integral role this entity plays in facilitating international cooperation. While not mandatory for Article 6.2, appointing an Article 6 focal point is highly recommended and serves as an important initial step in many countries. Although the DNA and Article 6 focal point can be separate entities, their roles often complement each other, enhancing coordination efforts. In countries with ample capacities, the focal point may be a well-established institution, such as a dedicated carbon market office. Conversely, in other nations, a focal point might be an individual supported by an alternate, showcasing the adaptability of this approach to various national contexts.
Ghana is one of the frontrunners of Article 6 institutional development. This case study elaborates on Ghana’s Article 6 strategy, including its institutional framework.
Download Case StudySenegal is moving ahead quickly. This case study discusses the recent steps that Senegal took regarding its Article 6 strategy and the advancements made in creating the institutional framework required to pursue and facilitate Article 6 engagement.
Download Case StudyThis case study describes Kenya’s approach to Article 6, including the ways in which the country intends to participate in Article 6.
Download Case StudyGuide: Developing an Article 6 host party institutional framework (GGGI 2023)
Brief: Implementing Article 6 of the Paris Agreement: Options for governance frameworks for host countries (GGGI 2023)
Manual: Article 6.4: Manual for host party participation in the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (PACM) UNFCCC (2025)
Guide: Guidance on Governance Models for Host Country Engagement in Article 6 (GGGI 2022)
List: Article 6.4: Designated National Authorities (DNAs) for the PACM (UNFCCC 2026)
How to define operational procedures?
To effectively participate in Article 6, a country must establish clear operational procedures covering key aspects—such as authorisation processes, and the tracking and reporting of ITMOs—in order to comply with mandatory participation requirements. Beyond these core functions, additional operational procedures are important to provide clarity for project developers and to foster a robust pipeline of mitigation activities. This may include adopting or specifying relevant methodologies, standards, and guidelines for cooperation under Article 6, as well as implementing safeguards to uphold environmental and social integrity throughout the process.
This section sheds light on some procedures and requirements, with a particular focus on activities generating ITMOs under Article 6.2. Operational procedures at the national level under the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (PACM) are addressed separately in the dropdown section Engaging in the PACM.
Download Checklist for Determining AdditionalityThe national priorities and requirements pertaining to Article 6 are pivotal in shaping the decisions made by the host country regarding the establishment of specific conditions for the adoption of methodologies, standards, and guidelines governing Article 6 cooperation.
Download Information Note on Approving MethodologiesBy providing authorisation for particular activities, host countries can uphold environmental integrity. This informational note seeks to outline the fundamental requirements and factors to consider for Article 6 authorisation procedures to achieve this objective effectively.
Download Information Note on Authorisation and Authorisation SafeguardsA corresponding adjustment is the process of accounting for carbon market actions against the national mitigation commitments. This is to ensure that an emission reduction is not counted as a mitigation by two different entities towards their Paris pledges. Below you find a 5-step guide on how to apply corresponding adjustments.
Download Guide to Applying Corresponding AdjustmentsThe letter of intent is issued to an activity developer, confirming that the activity aligns with the NDC of the host country. It affirms the availability of support for participants in A6.2 cooperative approaches and assures oversight to the instrumentalisation process.
Download Example for a “Letter of Intent“The letter of authorisation represents the final authorisation for the mitigation outcomes of an activity. The authorisation of mitigation outcomes transfers these mitigation outcomes into ITMOs, as long as the contract for the Mitigation Activity continues to be fulfilled.
Download Example for a “Letter of Authorisation”To uphold the Article 6 principles of environmental integrity and transparency, it is essential for Parties to report critical information on their Article 6 approaches clearly, accurately, and in a timely manner, including in their upcoming Biennial Transparency Reports (BTRs).
Download Information Note on ReportingGuidance: Guidance for stakeholders on applying COP29 Article 6 decisions (PCG 2025)
Host country authorisation
- Guidance: Key issues regarding Article 6 authorisation (PCG 2024)
- World Bank Template: Letter of Authorization and Acknowledgement for authorizations under Articles 6.2 and 6.4 of the Paris Agreement (WB 2025)
- Report: : Supporting authorizations under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement: Lessons learned and key considerations (PCG 2023)
Corresponding adjustments
Case Studies
- Best practices case studies: Article 6 Governance Frameworks in Action: A collection of case studies from 6 host countries (GGGI 2025)
- Report: Implementing Article 6 an overview of preparations in selected countries (Gold Standard 2023)
- Summary report: Designing Governance Structures and Transactional Documentation for Mitigation Outcome Transactions under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement GGGI (2021)
Reporting according to the Enhanced Transparency Framework under the Paris Agreement
- Manual: Article 6.2: Reference manual for the accounting, reporting and review of cooperative approaches (UNFCCC 2025)
- Handbook : Technical handbook for developing country Parties on Preparing for implementation of the enhanced transparency framework under the Paris Agreement (UNFCCC 2023)
Submitting reports through the Centralized Accounting and Reporting Platform (CARP)
- National focal points of participating Parties are required to submit reports through the UNFCCC submission portal.
- For more information on information sensitivity, classification, and handling procedures for data designated as confidential by participating Parties under Article 6, paragraph 2 of the Paris Agreement, please refer to the Article 6 Code of Practice.
How to develop the right Article 6 infrastructure?
Parties interested in participating in Article 6 activities must diligently track and account for the authorisation, transfer, and use of ITMOs under Article 6.2. Similarly, Parties must record Article 6.4 emission reductions (A6.4ERs) generated under Article 6.4 Mechanism (A6.4M), whether or not they are authorised for international transfer and use. Tracking and recording of carbon credits are conducted using specialised databases known as carbon credit registries. Under Article 6, three separate registries that are responsible for recording transactions, with two exclusively designated for Article 6.2 activities and the third specifically for Article 6.4 activities.
Parties engaged in cooperative approaches under Article 6.2 are required to consistently keep track of ITMO units or ITMO blocks. The information note contains more information on how this can be done.
Download Information Note on Article 6.2 RegistriesThis information note explains the Article 6.4 Mechanism Registry and the current status of discussion around A6.4ERs.
Download Information Note on A6.4M RegistryThe checklist presents factors that can assist Parties deciding whether to use the international registry offered by the UNFCCC or establish and maintain their own national registry for tracking ITMOs under Article 6.2.
Download the Checklist on Factors Influencing Registry Choice under Article 6.2Perspectives Climate Group (2023): Interlinkages of registries and implications for functions and structures in the context of Article 6
World Bank (2022): Infrastructure to meet reporting requirements under Article 6
OECD (2021): Understanding reporting and review under Articles 6 and 13 of the Paris Agreement
Which aspects should be considered regarding fee structures and benefit-sharing?
Numerous steps are involved in the process of generating mitigation outcomes and allocating revenue to diverse groups, including activity developers, governments and other (local) stakeholders. The host country government holds the potential to influence or stipulate provisions for many of these stages, with decisions contingent on the strategic objectives for engaging in Article 6. This section explores
considerations related to price generation for ITMOs, the sharing of benefits between host and buyer countries, the sharing of benefits on the national and sub-national level, as well as the fee structure designed to cover administrative fees and opportunity costs.
ITMO prices are typically documented in the MOPA and not publicly disclosed. The MOPA is negotiated between the entities overseeing an ITMO transaction.
Download Information Note on ITMO Price GenerationTo cover the costs of establishing and maintaining Article 6 Infrastructure a host country can impose levies or fees.
Download Information Note on Imposing Fees and LeviesThe equitable distribution of revenues from carbon market activities is gaining increasing traction in broader discussions around benefit-sharing within the carbon market realm.
Download Information Note on Sharing of Benefits between Host Country and BuyerUpcoming
[Gaps and challenges faced by host countries in implementing TLBs]
Climate Finance Innovators (2024): Setting an article 6 levy structure in Senegal: A practical guide to administrative fees and benefit sharing levies under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement
Carbon Limits (2023): Host country strategies for identifying and managing overselling risks under Article 6
Öko-Institut (2023): Assessing the transparency and integrity of benefit sharing arrangements related to voluntary carbon market projects
Climate Finance Innovators (2019): Operationalizing the Share of Proceeds for Article 6
Forest carbon partnership (n.d.): Designing Benefit Sharing Arrangements: A resource for countries
How to engage in the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (PACM)?
Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement establishes the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (PACM). It works as a UNFCCC-supervised crediting programme that issues carbon credits for projects or activities that cut emissions or remove carbon from the atmosphere. These credits, called Article 6.4 Emission Reductions (A6.4ERs), may be traded internationally if they are authorised by host country governments.
CDM projects and PoAs can transition to the Article 6.4 Mechanism (A6.4M) under certain conditions.
Download Checklist on CDM Transition RequirementsCERs issued under the CDM can contribute to NDCs under certain conditions, including the need for corresponding adjustments. The CDM ceased operations after June 30, 2023, with certain implications for CERs.
Download Information Note on Transitioning CERsThe A6.4 Supervisory Body has adopted the procedure for transitioning CDM activities to the A6.4M in July 2023. This segment details the different steps and timeline for activity transition.
Download Information Note CDM Transition ProcessFor more information on the CDM transition of activities, you can access the official webpage of the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism directed by the Supervisory Body.
Visit the CDM Transition page of the Supervisory BodyThe host party’s engagement is crucial to the successful transition of a CDM activities. Host party obligations typically include facilitating the transition process, ensuring transparency, and adhering to international guidelines and rules.
Download Information Note on Host Party Considerations for CDM TransitionGuide: Authorizing Article 6.4 Carbon Credits (Perspectives Climate Research 2025)
Transition of CDM activities to the PACM
- Explainer: Practical Guidance on transitioning eligible CDM activities to Article 6.4 (UNFCCC 2025)
- Webpage: Transition of CDM activities (UNFCCC)
- Brief: Guidance on the transition of cdm projects to article 6.4 activities (GGGI 2024)
- Report: Adapting CDM methodologies for use under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement (PCG 2024)
- Report : Lessons Learned from the Kyoto Mechanisms for the Article 6.4 Mechanism (PCG 2024)
What is the role of voluntary carbon market activities under Article 6?
Voluntary carbon market (VCM) activities can be authorised by Parties under Article 6, with decisions shaped by national strategic considerations. If a country opts to integrate VCM activities into its national carbon market framework (or equivalent system), the rules and requirements of Article 6 must apply, just as they do for any other authorised activities.
Click below to learn more about this market segment and how to approach and manage it effectively.
Explore our VCM Knowledge Hub page